This is a pretty good start. I can probably think of a few more things to watch out for.
One claim that might be too presumptive is Wikipedia as a source. Wikipedia actually has an excellent process for vetting content and contributors. It's not perfect and some errors and malicious actors and creep in before corrections are made. But for the most part, the process is transparent and will intended.
This piece is well written and easy to understand. We need to “flood the zone” with information like this, to raise our collective resistance to propaganda and disinformation. We “media literacy” to trend on TikTok.
This is a pretty good start. I can probably think of a few more things to watch out for.
One claim that might be too presumptive is Wikipedia as a source. Wikipedia actually has an excellent process for vetting content and contributors. It's not perfect and some errors and malicious actors and creep in before corrections are made. But for the most part, the process is transparent and will intended.
Feel free to share those other things to watch out for. Curious to know.
This piece is well written and easy to understand. We need to “flood the zone” with information like this, to raise our collective resistance to propaganda and disinformation. We “media literacy” to trend on TikTok.
I completely agree, but I haven't figured out tiktok yet.
Lol that makes two of us.
This is a powerful article and needs to be spread far and wide